Are We So Insensitive As To Mock Nidhi Razdan For Her Phishing Ordeal, Ask Netizens

Nidhi Razdan Harvard Phishing, Nidhi Razdan Harvard Interview

Award-winning journalist Nidhi Razdan, formerly with NDTV, took to social media on Friday to share that she had been the victim of an unfortunate phishing scam. In June 2020, Razdan had announced she would be quitting broadcast channel NDTV after a 21-year stint to head to the prestigious Harvard University as an Associate Professor. However, in the statement shared today, the journalist says she was made the target of a “sophisticated and coordinated phishing attack.” It is believed that the perpetrators could have gained access to her private information, leading Razdan to file an official complaint with the police.

Phishing scams, given the increased spread of the online network, are commonplace and for anyone to fall for them is undeniably tragic. But where most people have the privilege to grieve privately, Razdan is having to go through a lived experience of it all, both in reality as well as on social media. Overlooking the upsetting effort it must have taken for Razdan to share her ordeal on social media, the troll army has swooped down on her to painfully pick at the leftovers in a bid to embarrass her further. While some are calling for sensitivity, others have raised pertinent questions as to the circumstances surrounding the incident. Read more on that here.

This context brings notice to a deeply concerning state of affairs that is iterated and reiterated each day online: Is social media robbing us of our capacity for the basic facilities of empathy? Does ideology dictate our value systems so much so that we are remorseless in the face of a supposed mishap?

Razdan’s statement seems to communicate that she is neither seeking pity nor expecting netizens to be remorseful over her situation. Her statement was perhaps only an attempt to clear the air and avoid undue speculation. Is that not deserving of some sobriety in place of meme attacks?

Also Read: Does SC’s Idea On Keeping Women Out Of Protests Reflect Low Female Representation In Judiciary?

Are Journalists Becoming Soft Targets Of Data Breach?

What’s perhaps more alarming – especially in the thick of chatter around privacy breach and data encroachment by tech giants like WhatsApp – is that journalists seem to repeatedly be coming under attack. The intensity of the crime, as per Razdan’s statement, seems massive and dangerous, with possibly a ton of personal data compromised. As fate would have it, earlier in the day we also reported that Republic TV editor Arnab Goswami’s private chats too were leaked.

While support for both Razdan and Goswami comes from polar corners of the audience, it is worth questioning: Is it justified for journalists – regardless of their respective journalistic styles – to be maimed by encroachment of privacy that is then played out in full public view on the social media circus?

Some are arguing that journalists, as upholders of democracy, are relied on for their fact-checking abilities and astute observation powers, both part of a basic skill set needed for responsible reporting. How then did Razdan, with years of journalism behind her, fall for such a scam? Shouldn’t she have known better? Meanwhile, others have pointedly noted that there are some glaring loopholes in the entire situation. So must her journalistic prowess be put to trial? Yet others are of the opinion that this incident, though tragic, mustn’t be treated with derision but alertness. That it should act as a learning curve, on various fronts, for everyone.

Also Read: Australian Racer-Turned-Adult Star Renee Gracie Banned From Instagram, Twitter

Here is a mix of reactions to Nidhi Razdan’s phishing attack on social media: 

Views expressed are the author’s own.