The final order stated that the bench was unable to agree and that it has been redirected to be presented in front of the Chief Justice of India, NV Ramana before it is reassigned to a designated bench. 

The Karnataka High Court, earlier today, ruled that “hijab is not an essential part of Islam.”

Please do not spread it to larger levels. We know what is happening. Think over, is it proper to bring these things to Delhi: Supreme Court of India.

Are daughters entitled to their father’s property? Supreme Court finally answers the question through this judgment.

A Mumbai woman filed a petition against the guidelines under the POSH Act in the Supreme Court of India.

India’s Attorney General KK Venugopal too had challenged Justice Ganediwala’s infamous “skin to skin” verdict.

Reading out the verdict, Justice Bela M Trivedi said that the restriction of Section 7 of the POCSO act to physical touch is “absurd” and it destroys the intent of the act which is supposed to protect children from any sexual offence.

The court also asked the government to be a “model employer” and should not discriminate among its employees, while adding that monetary benefits should be given to all who were employed at the same time and belong to the same cadre.

The plea argued that despite the Domestic Violence Act of 2005 being in force for more than 15 years, domestic violence continues to be a common crime against women. 

Viewing the risk to law and order, as well as the nature of Sai’s crime, his furlough plea this time has been rejected by the Supreme Court.